R. 1400.7800 C. (2013) (on the basis that any agreement, settlement agreement or approval decision made by either party prior to the hearing must be recorded in the minutes). Once you have fully cited a particular authority, you can use a short quote. The specific content of a short formula is flexible, but varies depending on the type of authority cited. Acceptable links for a particular citation are dealt with in each entry. Most settlement agreements are reduced to the letter and signed by the parties. However, if agreements are reached shortly before or during the hearing, the parties sometimes record the terms of their agreement in the minutes. However, in the absence of a protocol on the procedure, the oral agreement of the parties must be in writing and signed at a later date.
This is a necessary protection as most of the contested proceedings are registered and the tapes are eventually deleted.  The rights of a party opposing a settlement agreement do not include the right to be heard if the objection raises only legal and political issues. As far as law and politics are concerned, the opponent limits himself to arguing.  If an organization accepts a settlement agreement that was not reached unanimously, it must respond to the counterparty`s objections and any finding required by applicable law.  The Bluebook is the dominant citation agency that regulates how U.S. legal documents are cited. Familiarizing yourself with the rules is essential to your legal career. State laws follow a similar structure, but where possible, it is sufficient to cite the corresponding section of the Code.  Cf. Minn.
If a consent order or settlement agreement is made, the parties may submit a copy to the judge and request that the continuation of the proceedings be set aside and that the official record be returned to the agency. In most cases, however, parties are not required to file copies of these documents with the judge. Settlement agreements and consent orders generally do not have to be included in the official minutes under the PPA or the contested case rules.  According to the rules, the only provisions, consent orders and agreements that must be included in the official protocol are those made before a controversial hearing is convened.  If the hearing is never called, these documents do not need to be recorded in the official file. Since a hearing is rarely called once the matter has been settled, the rule in the contested case is limited to the filing of provisions, consent orders and settlement agreements. It applies only to orders and agreements that do not completely resolve the problems of a case, or to those that are subject to judicial approval or a hearing obligation.  Minn. R. 5000.1100, paragraph 5 (2013). The judge may make orders containing the terms of settlement agreements in other discrimination cases. Id.
5000.0800, subp. 3. The APA allows for the informal resolution of disputed cases by arbitration, agreement, agreement, consent or default order.  Some statutes exclude default decisions by prohibiting any administrative action without a hearing, even if the person affected by the proposed measure does not appear at the hearing and may otherwise be in default.  Under these laws, a hearing is required even if the case is not contested or the opposing party is in default, and the proponent must usually provide prima facie evidence of its right to discharge. It is important that the sources you rely on in your legal writings, such as cases, laws and regulations, are cited with sufficient accuracy so that they can be easily found by a reader of the document. Precise quotations also indicate the competence and weight of a primary authority. A statement that is not quoted indicates original thoughts and should only take place if what you have written comes entirely from your own head. In short quotes, it is enough to quote by document number, but to avoid confusion, one must indicate the state unless a federal law is discussed.
In general, you should abbreviate as much as possible without losing the necessary information. The Bluebook recommends, for example, shortening procedural phrases to abbreviations such as „In re“ or „Ex parte“ and using generally understandable abbreviations to shorten the names of the parties, para. B example „Univ.“ instead of „Universität“. The names of the source and the court are usually also abbreviated; In the following example, federal rule decisions are shortened to „F.R.D.“ and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is marked with „W.D. Pa.“ Sources and dishes tend to have official abbreviations for this purpose, which are usually provided ostensibly to anyone who needs to cite them. State laws follow a similar structure, but where possible, it is sufficient to cite the appropriate section of the Code. Informal agreements are encouraged by the courts.
Mankato Aglime & Rock Co. vs City of Mankato, 434 N.W.2d 490, 494 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). In short, it is sufficient to cite by document number, although to avoid confusion it is necessary to indicate the State, except in the case of a debate on a federal law. SHORT CITATION NOTE: According to Article 11, Constitutions, you cannot use a short citation other than Id. for constitutions. Tables are used in combination with rules. It is an indispensable resource to which we can refer where and when they are abbreviated.  Minn. R.
5000.1100, paragraph 5 (2013). The judge may issue orders containing the terms of settlement agreements in other cases of discrimination. Id. 5000.0800, subp. Short citations for laws should include the section number as well as the minimum information required to determine which of your previously cited authorities the citation refers to. For example, an appropriate abbreviated form for the above-mentioned Guano Islands Law could be: if an approval decision or settlement agreement is reached, the parties may submit a copy to the judge and request the annulment of the subsequent proceedings and the return of the official protocol to the Agency. In most cases, however, the parties are not required to provide the judge with copies of these documents. As a general rule, settlement agreements and approval orders should not be included in the formal protocol established in accordance with the APA or the rules of procedure.  According to the rules, the only provisions, consent orders and agreements to be included in the official protocol are those that were entered into before a contentious hearing was convened.
 If the trial is never called, these documents should not be included in the official file. Since an oral hearing is rarely convened when the case is settled, the dispute rule is limited to the submission of provisions, approval decisions and concordations. It applies only to injunctions and agreements that do not completely resolve the problems of a case, or to those that are subject to judicial approval or an obligation to hear […].